From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: equalTupleDescs() ignores ccvalid/ccnoinherit |
Date: | 2014-03-21 23:27:41 |
Message-ID: | 28937.1395444461@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
> FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
I agree with Robert. This is a bug, let's fix it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-21 23:36:28 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe Reply-To: |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2014-03-21 23:07:13 | Best way to know frequency of column reference? |