Re: Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Robert <robert(at)robert(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Threads vs processes - The Apache Way (Re: Path to PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-05-10 16:00:38
Message-ID: 28818.1021046438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> Without some buy-in from the core team, I'm not sure I am willing to spend my
> time on it. If someone would be willing to fund the 100 or so man-hours
> required to do it, then that would be a different story.

You are not going to get any buy-in with such ridiculous claims as that.
If the total cost of a native Windows port were O(100 hours), it'd have
been done long since. Add a couple zeroes on the end and I'd start to
believe that you might have some grasp of the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2002-05-10 16:09:05 Re: the parsing of parameters
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-10 15:17:39 Re: the parsing of parameters