| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
| Date: | 2010-08-14 03:10:37 |
| Message-ID: | 28629.1281755437@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, as worded, it says we have to group by everything, which is not
> true in 9.1, so I figured let's see what feedback we get and we can add
> a new one if we want, but our old argument is invalid, since we did
> implement part of what we said we wouldn't. ;-)
Uh, no. What we said we wouldn't implement is "Indeterminate behavior
for the GROUP BY clause". We haven't implemented any part of that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-14 03:22:07 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:53:57 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-14 03:22:07 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:53:57 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |