Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth
Date: 2013-10-30 13:49:26
Message-ID: 28492.1383140966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-10-30 09:26:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't this complaining about the main shm segment, not a DSM extension?

> Don't think so, that has a ":" in the name.

If it *isn't* about the main memory segment, what the hell are we doing
creating random addon segments during bootstrap? None of the DSM code
should even get control at this point, IMO.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-10-30 13:52:05 Re: appendStringInfo vs appendStringInfoString
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-10-30 13:37:18 Re: Something fishy happening on frogmouth