Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?
Date: 2009-12-13 20:45:54
Message-ID: 28314.1260737154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> * NonTransactionalInvalidation logging has been removed following
> review, but AFAICS that means VACUUM FULL doesn't work correctly on
> catalog tables, which regrettably will be the only ones still standing
> even after we apply VFI patch. Did I misunderstand the original intent?
> Was it just buggy somehow? Or is this hoping VF goes completely, which
> seems unlikely in this release.

For my money, the only reason VF is still around is there hasn't been
an urgent reason to get rid of it. If it doesn't play with HS, I think
we'd be better served to put work into getting rid of it than to put
work into fixing it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-12-13 20:51:33 Re: compiling with Visual Studio
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-13 20:36:06 Re: WAL Info messages