Re: depended on table types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: depended on table types
Date: 2005-03-17 22:51:25
Message-ID: 28155.1111099885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is one supposed to be able to alter the type of a table whose definition
> has been used A composite in another table?

If the alter is of a kind that we can support, yes.

> Somewhat surprisingly to
> me, the following test did not produce an error:

> create table a( x text, y int);
> create table b( z a);
> insert into b values('(\'aaa\',3)');
> select * from b;
> alter table a add column q timestamp not null;
> select * from b;

This variant fails:

d=# alter table a add column qq timestamp default now() not null;
ERROR: cannot alter table "a" because column "b"."z" uses its rowtype

If you're unhappy about the "not null" part, the long and short of that
is that rowtypes don't carry along table constraints (yet), so it's
legal for b.z.q to show as null.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-03-17 23:00:04 Re: Lockfile restart failure is still there :-(
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-03-17 22:45:54 Re: Lockfile restart failure is still there :-(