"rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Date: 2015-04-07 19:33:38
Message-ID: 28144.1428435218@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I tried to mark the "UPDATE SET (*)" patch as "returned with feedback",
but the CF app informed me that if I did that the patch would
automatically be moved to the next commitfest. That seems completely
stupid. There is no need to reconsider it unless a new version of the
patch is forthcoming (which there may or may not ever be, but that's
beside the point for now). When and if the author does submit a new
patch, that would be the time to include it in the next commitfest, no?

I ended up marking it "rejected" instead, but that seems a bit harsh.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-04-07 19:35:31 Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-04-07 19:22:18 Re: Support UPDATE table SET(*)=...