Re: Possible bug with array_agg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug with array_agg
Date: 2009-11-19 19:36:02
Message-ID: 28117.1258659362@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> On 8.4.0 I found that array_agg does not return a value when fed more
> than 12,000 values. (12,000 worked and 13,000 did not.)

What do you mean by "does not return a value"?

In general, giving a specific test case is a lot more helpful than
this sort of vague report. Whatever you're seeing could easily
depend on the specific data you're aggregating, for example.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Bailey 2009-11-19 19:45:36 Re: Possible bug with array_agg
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-11-19 19:30:42 Re: Possible bug with array_agg