Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-08-21 13:47:50
Message-ID: 2809.1250862470@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> NOTICEs is what we do with index creation on primary key, unique
> indexes, and sequences on serial columns, and I think they are seen as
> just noise by everyone except novices. Do we want to add more?

> Maybe they should be INFO, so that they are shown to the client but not
> sent to the server log.

There was some discussion awhile back of creating a new NOVICE message
level. INFO strikes me as a completely bad idea here, because it would
actually make it harder for non-novices to suppress the messages.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-21 14:00:59 Re: Geometric Elimination
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-08-21 13:22:34 SIGUSR1 pingpong between master na autovacum launcher causes crash