Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Date: 2005-11-12 16:18:51
Message-ID: 27991.1131812331@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Sure, CATALOG_VERSION isn't that useful, but it's the only thing in the
> header files that gives any kind of indication what version you're
> compiling against. PG_VERSION is a string, which diminishes its
> usefulness considerably.

How so? All we care about is being able to (1) compare for equality,
and (2) print out something useful in error messages. I claim that
PG_VERSION does #1 equally well and #2 better.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-11-12 16:49:27 Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-11-12 16:16:13 Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload