Re: Client application name

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-21 14:49:09
Message-ID: 27924.1256136549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> Should we perhaps change the behaviour of the backend to give a
> warning only for unknown settings in the startup packet?

It's not going to help, unless you first invent a time machine so
we can retroactively cause all PG servers that are already in the field
to behave that way.

> It doesn't
> seem beyond the realms of possibility that we might want to add
> something else in the future, and this will at least mean that in a
> few releases time it might be reasonably safe to do so.

This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but
it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-21 14:54:17 Re: \du quite ugly in 8.4
Previous Message u235sentinel 2009-10-21 14:35:55 Re: postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?