Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Date: 2012-07-13 22:36:23
Message-ID: 27764.1342218983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> For what it's worth, I would appreciate it if you would post the lock
> timeout patch for the upcoming commitfest.

+1. I think it's reasonable to get the infrastructure patch in now,
but we are running out of time in this commitfest (and there's still
a lot of patches that haven't been reviewed at all).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2012-07-13 23:25:39 Re: initdb and fsync
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-07-13 22:25:26 Re: isolation check takes a long time