Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Jie Zhang" <jzhang(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes
Date: 2006-08-15 01:38:36
Message-ID: 27266.1155605916@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Attached is an update to the patch implementing bitmap indexes Jie sent
> last week.

What's the current status of this patch ... has any work been done since
the first of the month?

I suppose the patch as given here no longer applies to HEAD, because of
recent changes in rmgr for Simon's restartable-recovery patch (should be
easy enough to fix) and consumption of OIDs by other patches (also easy
to fix, in principle, but doubtless tedious).

If you have to renumber OIDs I'd suggest starting at 3000 for your added
OIDs, to leave some daylight for any other patches that go in during the
next couple weeks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2006-08-15 01:50:11 Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes
Previous Message andrew 2006-08-15 00:14:24 Re: domains code query

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2006-08-15 01:50:11 Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-14 21:42:58 Re: [Patch] - Fix for bug #2558, InitDB failed to run