Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-06-03 15:28:49
Message-ID: 26873.1275578929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Are we sure we want hstore compatibility to drive this decision?

hstore is what it is, and has been that way for a long time. We can't
just ignore it. And I don't think breaking it (and probably other code)
on zero notice is an acceptable outcome.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-03 15:30:15 Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-06-03 15:27:51 Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay