Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Date: 2003-11-14 16:43:38
Message-ID: 26709.1068828218@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> I'm not suggesting making that the default setup, just loosening the
> paranoia check so that if an admin sets the directory to be group
> readable the database doesn't refuse to start up.

In previous discussions of this point, paranoia was considered desirable.
I don't think the situation has changed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-14 16:44:08 Re: ALTER TABLE modifications
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-14 16:40:38 Re: Background writer process

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-14 16:44:08 Re: ALTER TABLE modifications
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-14 16:38:20 Re: ALTER TABLE modifications