| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |
| Date: | 2014-04-08 20:02:48 |
| Message-ID: | 26488.1396987368@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> NICE. I'd like to tell you how excited I am about this part:
> # It also handles a new network
> # operator inet && inet (overlaps, a/k/a "is supernet or subnet of"),
> # which is expected to be useful in exclusion constraints.
> ...but I can't, because my mouth is too full of drool. Wouldn't you
> really want that more for cidr than for inet, though?
Probably, but it works with either since they're binary-compatible.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-08 20:13:21 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-04-08 19:56:52 | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |