| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Releasing 7.4.3 ... |
| Date: | 2004-06-14 12:52:14 |
| Message-ID: | 26254.1087217534@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being used to build it.
> I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's
> version of lynx back when we were making this file manually.
> (The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to
> do fine.)
Actually, having just tried it, 2.8.5rel.1 generates output that is
nearly indistinguishable from what's in this morning's snapshot.
In particular I do not get the ASCII-art decoration for the table of
supported platforms that I see in the 7.4.2 version of INSTALL.
It comes out exactly like what's in the snapshot.
I'm now wondering about changes in the SGML stylesheets used to generate
the .html file we then send to lynx. But I would definitely put this
in the category of "something to investigate and fix later".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-14 13:15:02 | Re: Delaying the planning of unnamed statements until Bind |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-14 12:42:46 | Re: File leak? |