| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Date: | 2013-08-24 17:33:36 |
| Message-ID: | 26176.1377365616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Oracle has a special function for returning sets from procedures - see a
> new functionality "Implicit Result Sets"
> http://tkyte.blogspot.cz/2013/07/12c-implicit-result-sets.html
That article is worth reading, because Tom K. points out exactly why
T-SQL's approach is a bad idea compared to returning refcursors.
It's not clear to me that we should be in a hurry to go there, much less
try to be 100% syntax compatible with it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-08-24 19:16:53 | Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL |
| Previous Message | Marc Cousin | 2013-08-24 17:19:52 | Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL |