Re: compressed protocol

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: compressed protocol
Date: 2006-09-04 00:46:27
Message-ID: 2590.1157330787@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> zeljko <zeljko(at)holobit(dot)net> writes:
>>> Is there any plans (or somebody already working on) to see compressed
>>> protocol in 8.2 ?
>>
>> Why bother? Run your session through an ssh tunnel and ask it to
>> compress.

> Wouldn't that add extra libssl overhead?

Well, (a) if you're sending your data over a nonlocal network (and over
a LAN, you don't need compression), you probably want some encryption.
(b) I believe there's a "null cipher" mode for SSL if you truly don't
need encryption.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-04 00:49:34 Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2006-09-04 00:39:49 Re: compressed protocol