Re: Rejecting weak passwords

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date: 2009-10-20 13:42:36
Message-ID: 25830.1256046156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> 2009/10/19 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Now we have a user with name equal to password, which no sane security
>> policy will think is a good thing, but the plugin had no chance to
>> prevent it.

> The big difference is that you need to be superuser to change the name
> of a user, but not to change your own password.

True, but the superuser doesn't necessarily know what the user has
set his password to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-10-20 13:58:14 Re: per table random-page-cost?
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-10-20 12:42:23 Re: Client application name