Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG qsort vs. Solaris
Date: 2006-10-03 14:48:42
Message-ID: 25566.1159886922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Is it time to "remove" PG qsort and use libc version for solaris 9, 10...?

I have no particular desire to introduce a version number check until we
have to. If you can show that the newer versions have a qsort that
substantially *out-performs* ours, it would be worth doing that, but
merely being competitive isn't enough to make it worth the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey E. Koposov 2006-10-03 14:48:49 7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-03 14:45:39 Re: tsearch2 error msg