Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-12 23:43:20
Message-ID: 25485.1247442200@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Oh, I didn't think about the Flex version. That's going to be a far
>> more widespread problem. OSX 10.5, for example, still ships with
>> 2.5.33. I suspect that a *lot* of OSes won't have anything up-to-date.

> That's the version Tom is proposing to make the minimum.

Yeah, 2.5.33 is fine (in fact it's what I installed on my HPUX box to
replace 2.5.4). AFAICS OSX 10.5 is fine, but 10.4 will need a newer
flex version. This is not anything very new to Mac users. 10.4 also
shipped with bison 1.28, which is too old to build Postgres and has been
too old for many years now. So anyone building from CVS on that
platform has already installed at least one nondefault tool.

(For comparison's sake: flex 2.5.4 was released in 1996. 2.5.31, which
I'm proposing to make the new minimum, was released in 2003. Bison
1.875, our current minimum for that tool, was released in 2002, and
we made it the minimum required version in 2003.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-07-13 00:02:04 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite rev.2163
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-07-12 23:10:46 Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5