Re: latestCompletedXid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: latestCompletedXid
Date: 2008-10-10 20:49:02
Message-ID: 2547.1223671742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that we need not move latestCompletedXid as a result of an abort.

I see no value in this; it just makes things less consistent without
buying any noticeable performance gain.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-10 21:00:35 Re: How is random_page_cost=4 ok?
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-10-10 20:48:48 Re: Building Postgres in Eclipse