Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> then, something is wrong because \ddp+ should be giving an error
> (because that command doesn't exist and \dd seems to be accepting the
> p+ as a parameter)
No, it's just ignoring the p+, not treating it as a parameter. I agree
this is bogus --- patch committed.
regards, tom lane