Re: 8.1 iss

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "PostgreSQL" <martin(at)portant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.1 iss
Date: 2005-11-06 16:31:18
Message-ID: 25136.1131294678@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"PostgreSQL" <martin(at)portant(dot)com> writes:
> This is a pretty good example of the place where 8.1 seems to be quite
> broken.

That's a bit of a large claim on the basis of one data point.
Did you remember to re-ANALYZE after loading the table into the
new database?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • 8.1 iss at 2005-11-06 09:55:18 from PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-06 17:10:06 Re: [PERFORM] insert performance for win32
Previous Message Joost Kraaijeveld 2005-11-06 13:30:54 Performance PG 8.0 on dual opteron / 4GB / 3ware Raid5 / Debian??