Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state
Date: 2009-12-06 11:54:20
Message-ID: 24B46FC5-FA0C-4D4C-B549-AADC3845EFB4@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 6, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 18:13 -0700, James Pye wrote:
>> On Dec 5, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>> I'm not volunteering here, but having worked with the protocol, I
>> do have a suggestion:
>
> Thanks. Looks like good input. With the further clarification that we
> use NOTIFY it seems a solution is forming.

Notice, not NOTIFY.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-06 14:20:25 Re: Hot standby, recent changes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-06 11:20:50 Re: Hot standby, recent changes