| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: plperl sigfpe reset can crash the server |
| Date: | 2012-09-05 17:15:52 |
| Message-ID: | 2477.1346865352@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 06:10:02 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 25, 2012 06:38:09 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Surely that's breaking perl's expectations, to more or less the same
>>> degree they're breaking ours?
>> In the referenced bug they agree that this is the way forward.
> As nobody has any better ideas here is a patch doing that:
OK. Do we want to commit this now, or wait till after 9.2.0?
My feeling is it's probably okay to include in 9.2.0, but I can see
that somebody might want to argue not to. Any objections out there?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-09-05 17:32:13 | Re: plperl sigfpe reset can crash the server |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-09-05 17:08:43 | Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest' |