From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-20 16:17:50 |
Message-ID: | 24769.1064074670@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> No, I'm not suggesting no catalog changes ... wait, I might be wording
> this wrong ... there are two changes that right now requires a
> dump/reload, changes to the catalogs and changes to the data structures,
> no? Or are these effectively inter-related?
Oh, what you're saying is no changes in user table format. Yeah, we
could probably commit to that now. Offhand the only thing I think it
would hold up is the one idea about converting "interval" into a
three-component value, and I'm not sure if anyone had really committed
to work on that anyway ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | peter pilsl | 2003-09-20 16:39:35 | Re: 'order by' does "wrong" with unicode-chars (german umlauts) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-20 16:05:44 | Re: 'order by' does "wrong" with unicode-chars (german umlauts) |