Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-03 19:43:52
Message-ID: 24768.1188848632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.

Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
subset of the community most interested in this change and least
interested in the ensuing costs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-03 19:47:43 Re: A renaming analogy
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-09-03 19:39:49 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-03 19:51:02 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-09-03 19:39:49 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)