From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Soroosh Sardari <soroosh(dot)sardari(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Memory deallocation after calling cast function |
Date: | 2014-06-17 16:21:35 |
Message-ID: | 2461.1403022095@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-06-17 21:09:25 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>> At 2014-06-17 11:32:37 -0400, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us wrote:
>>> Uh, what is replacing SRFs? CTEs?
>> I don't think Tom was referring to SRFs in general, only putting them
>> directly into the targetlist of a SELECT.
> And the primary reason for using SRFs in the targetlist has gone away
> due to LATERAL.
Exactly. LATERAL does what you usually want from a SRF in the
targetlist, and it doesn't have bizarre semantics when you use more than
one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-17 16:21:47 | Re: PL/pgSQL support to define multi variables once |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-06-17 16:15:10 | Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE |