Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-15 18:53:11
Message-ID: 24522.1239821591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As both this and the doubling-\\ way would mean we should have usable
> alternative in case of stdstr=off also, so in the end we have agreed
> to accept \u also?

Given Martijn's complaint about more-than-16-bit code points, I think
the \u proposal is not mature enough to go into 8.4. We can think
about some version of that later, if there's enough interest.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2009-04-15 20:19:42 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-15 18:50:46 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world