Re: problems with large table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Charnoky <noky(at)nextbus(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problems with large table
Date: 2007-09-12 17:42:31
Message-ID: 24409.1189618951@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> At this point, you are in a world of hurt :). If you stop a vacuum you
> have created a huge mess of dead rows in that table.

Only if it was a vacuum full, which he didn't mention having tried.

I'm kinda wondering whether the vacuum and reindex did anything at all,
or were blocked by some other process holding a lock on the table.
If they weren't blocked, then the problem is insufficient patience,
possibly combined with insufficient maintenance_work_mem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-09-12 17:59:31 Re: Debian problem...
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2007-09-12 17:39:20 Re: Event-driven programming?