Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1

From: "Lars Ewald (web(dot)de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1
Date: 2014-08-01 18:00:10
Message-ID: 243700781.29477.1406916010739.open-xchange@oxbaltgw56.schlund.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Hello Rainer,

> What PostgreSQl exact version are you trying to compile?
9.3.4

Bye,
Lars

> Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com> hat am 28. Juli 2014 um 07:58
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello,
> What PostgreSQl exact version are you trying to compile?
> I like to test this with the IBM compiler.
>
> Bye
> Rainer
>
> On 26.07.2014 00:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Lars Ewald (web.de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de> writes:
> >> Hello Tom,
> >> today I was able to do some tests compiling Postgres on our AIX machine.
> >> And...it worked! :-) Configuring without spinlocks and readline worked fine
> >> for
> >> me and did not abort after compiling xlog.o/xlog.c.
> >> Any ideas why it does not work with spinlocks?
> > Well, spinlocks are what uses the assembler code that you're having
> > trouble with.
> >
> > Note that while you can build with --disable-spinlocks, performance is
> > not likely to be acceptable. We don't really consider a platform
> > supported unless it's got working spinlocks.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> >
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message danghuu.ken 2014-08-01 18:20:10 BUG #11108: Missing Binaries
Previous Message Lars Ewald (web.de) 2014-08-01 17:59:23 Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien 2014-08-01 18:46:03 add modulo (%) operator to pgbench
Previous Message Lars Ewald (web.de) 2014-08-01 17:59:23 Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1