| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: robots.txt on git.postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2013-07-09 19:35:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2433.1373398542@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>> What's blocking alternatives to be considered? I already did mention
>> cgit, which has the advantage to clearly show the latest patch on all
>> the active branches in its default view, which would match our branch
>> usage pretty well I think.
> ...
> If they do all those things, and people do like those interfaces, then
> sure, we can do that.
cgit is what Red Hat is using, and I have to say I don't like it much.
I find gitweb much more pleasant overall. There are a few nice things
in cgit but lots of things that are worse.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-07-09 19:39:23 | Re: Review: extension template |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2013-07-09 19:28:58 | [REVIEW] row level security (v3) |