Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Luke Porter <luke_porter(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-02-01 16:01:56
Message-ID: 24238.1201881716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luke Porter <luke_porter(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is there an interest in developing bitemporal functionality in PostgreSQL

Is that anything like the late, mostly unlamented "time travel" feature?

regards, tom lane

PS: in general, defining what you want with one word and assuming
everyone will grok the full meaning and implications of that is a good
way to get ignored on this list. Assuming we have never heard of
"bitemporal" is a better starting point.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2008-02-01 16:04:58 Re: Limit changes query plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-01 15:50:16 Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target