Re: WIP: RangeTypes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: RangeTypes
Date: 2011-01-17 23:59:14
Message-ID: 24200.1295308754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I feel like I'm making this too complicated. Should I just scope out
> NULL range boundaries for the first cut, and leave room in the
> representation so that it can be added when there is a more thorough
> proposal for NULL range boundaries?

+1. I'm far from convinced that a null boundary is sane at all.
If you don't know the value, how do you know it's greater/less than the
other bound?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-01-18 00:09:12 Re: WIP: RangeTypes
Previous Message Brar Piening 2011-01-17 23:32:41 Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support