Re: Schema version management

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-05 14:46:52
Message-ID: 23915.1341499612@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe it could be made an option to pg_dump?

Ick. Then we have to deal with all the downsides of *both* methods.

pg_dump is already a bloated, nearly unmaintainable mess. The very
last thing it needs is even more options.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2012-07-05 15:06:55 Re: Schema version management
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2012-07-05 14:35:52 Re: Schema version management