Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date: 2011-02-12 23:38:53
Message-ID: 2376E872-9F13-46E6-BD2D-4D236F640387@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 12, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> How likely is *that*?
>
> Not very, but the rules are getting a bit complicated ...

Doesn't seem complicated to me:

1. Use -- to separate extension name, old version, new version
2. Don't use - at the beginning or end of name or version number
3. Profit

How hard is that?

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles.McDevitt 2011-02-12 23:44:53 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-12 23:37:53 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling