Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?
Date: 2014-01-24 00:05:09
Message-ID: 23110.1390521909@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Do we have a real policy against indenting nested preprocessor
> statments? Just so I don't do those in future patches...

Indent 'em if you like, but pgindent will undo it. I ran the patch
through pgindent to see what it would do with those, and it left-justified
them, so I committed it that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-24 00:29:23 Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-01-23 23:55:21 Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?