| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ragged CSV import |
| Date: | 2009-09-10 14:11:14 |
| Message-ID: | 23084.1252591874@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm... in fact, what if we just implemented COPY returning text[] for
> a first cut, and forget making it act like a table source for now.
> Then you could COPY to a temp table (with a text[] column) and select
> from there. There's really two separate features here: COPY producing
> text[] rather than a record type, and COPY being embeddable in some
> larger query.
That might be a reasonable way-station ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-10 14:23:33 | Re: Elementary dependency look-up |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-10 14:09:23 | Re: Ragged CSV import |