| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |
| Date: | 2013-06-27 16:12:24 |
| Message-ID: | 22881.1372349544@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>> It could be pretty satisfactory to have a simple listing, in the
>> release notes, of the set of reviewers. That's a lot less
>> bookkeeping than tracking this for each and every change.
> Adding the names to each release note item is not a problem; the
> problem is the volume of names that overwhelms the release note text. If
> we went that direction, I predict we would just remove _all_ names from
> the release notes.
Yeah. Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of the audience for
the release notes doesn't actually give a darn who implemented what.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2013-06-27 16:17:10 | Re: extensible external toast tuple support & snappy prototype |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2013-06-27 16:00:38 | Re: Min value for port |