| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_class.relistemp |
| Date: | 2011-07-15 16:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 2259.1310747136@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 21:59, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> So if we're going to break compatibility, then we could stand to make a
>> little noise about it.
> We've broken the admin apps in pretty much every single release. And
> they generally don't complain.
Yeah. Quite honestly, this thread is trying to turn a molehill into a
mountain. I will confidently predict that the really big, nasty change
in 9.1 is the change of default standard_conforming_strings. That's
going to break way more apps than anything else, and possibly in
security-critical ways. Anybody who moves an app onto 9.1 without
testing it is going to suffer big-time.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-15 16:36:00 | Re: pg_class.relistemp |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-15 16:16:50 | Re: Is there a committer in the house? |