| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ragnar Hafstað <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with PITR recovery |
| Date: | 2005-04-18 16:04:09 |
| Message-ID: | 22321.1113840249@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Ragnar Hafsta wrote:
>> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 23:06 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I am not clear on what the "backup dump file" is? I assume it means
>>> 0000000100001234000055CD. It is called "WAL segment file" above. I
>>> will rename that phrase to match the above terminology. Patch attached
>>> and applied.
>>
>> Doesn't it refer to the backup file itself (the tar file of the data
>> directory) ?
> No. That is what I thought it meant on first reading, but looking
> closer it is referring to the numbered file, and the tar file has no
> specific number.
Yes, that is exactly what it meant, and your patch has destroyed the
meaning.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-18 16:06:25 | Re: Problem with PITR recovery |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-18 15:31:06 | Re: Call to build-in operator from new operator |