Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Date: 2012-09-01 19:06:57
Message-ID: 22095.1346526417@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 02:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think that the "no sockdir" case is broken and you
>> should get rid of it. If you're starting a postmaster, you can and
>> should tell it a sockdir, period. If you're running a live check this
>> code is all moot anyway.

> I don't think you understand. The "no sockdir" case is only for live
> checks of pre-9.1 old servers, because we can't find the socket
> directory being used. Everything else uses the local directory for the
> socket. If we remove that case, we can't do live checks on pre-9.1
> servers.

If it's a live check, then (a) you aren't restarting the postmaster,
and (b) you wouldn't want to lock out TCP anyway. So adding
--listen-addresses to the string seems pointless and/or wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-01 19:45:25 Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-01 19:05:01 Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade