Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

From: "Mike Ellsworth" <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Date: 2007-08-08 18:16:32
Message-ID: 219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On 8/8/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2007 18:11 schrieb Derek Rodner:
> >> While the wording of the press release is cause for concern in the
> >> community because of "first-ever" and "professional grade", we need to
> >> do this for marketing purposes. If we had said "EnterpriseDB releases
> >> yet another PostgreSQL distribution" then no one would cover it.
> >
> > Well, at least you are admitting that you are not telling the truth.
> >
> > I will suggest, however, that knowingly wrong material should not be
> posted on
> > the postgresql.org web site any longer.
>
> How do we make that determination?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

I was under the impression that www scrutinizes all Press Releases prior to
posting to the site. Not true?

It would seem to make more sense to do so as issues such as this could be
worked out privately.
Presoak the laundry before hanging on the line. Otherwise, neighbors may
gossip.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 18:24:21 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Previous Message Lewis Cunningham 2007-08-08 18:14:27 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-08 18:24:21 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Previous Message Lewis Cunningham 2007-08-08 18:14:27 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres