| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) |
| Date: | 2014-06-03 20:24:58 |
| Message-ID: | 21826.1401827098@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Pah. So what we need is a new mode, REGRESSTEST ON or something.
> Well, we could invent that. But I personally think piggybacking on
> COSTS makes more sense.
I've been eagerly waiting for 8.4 to die so I could stop worrying
about how far back I can back-patch regression test cases using
"explain (costs off)". It'd be really annoying to have to wait
another five years to get a consistent new spelling of how to do
that. So yeah, let's stick to using COSTS OFF in the tests.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-03 20:31:55 | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-03 20:18:14 | Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) |