Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More extension issues: ownership and search_path
Date: 2011-02-07 17:59:07
Message-ID: 21684.1297101547@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Interesting point. It's all right at the moment because I tweaked
>> pg_dump_sort.c so that procedural languages are dumped before modules.
>> But maybe we should convert the PLs to modules.

> s/modules/extensions/?

Yeah, I keep saying "module". Memo to self: grep the whole patch for
"module" before committing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-02-07 17:59:57 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-07 17:57:51 Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature