Re: Is it time for triage on the open patches?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Is it time for triage on the open patches?
Date: 2012-03-10 15:47:47
Message-ID: 21554.1331394467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> * pg_stat_statements looks good also, I hope someone is looking at that

I will take that one, if it ever gets marked RFC, but in the meantime
I plan to spend my time elsewhere.

> At this stage the CF app isn't helping us much. We need some way to
> indicate who is actively working on review, not just a list of people
> who have at some point reviewed it. Patches without committers will
> likely suffer, so we need to be able to see the Committers column on
> the display, so we know whether a patch needs one assigned.

I've kind of wished the Committer field could be seen in the list view
too, although I'm not sure what I'd give up for it (narrowing the other
fields doesn't sound good). Mainly what I wanted it for is to check
"is there anything I claimed and have not dealt with"; which is not
something I need to check every time I look, so perhaps some different
view could cover this need.

Another thing that would be really nice is the ability to sort open
items by last-activity time (disregarding the category labels), to make
it easier to spot which items are not receiving any attention.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-10 16:26:44 Re: Future of our regular expression code
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-03-10 15:36:59 Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?