From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of temp tables |
Date: | 2001-06-14 20:15:03 |
Message-ID: | 21540.992549703@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> If you don't like pg_temp here, maybe post_temp? pgsql_temp?
> What if I call the directory tmp or pgsql_tmp and the files
> pgsql_pid_#.#?
Why are you so eager not to call temp files "temp"? If you want to
spell it "pgsql_tmp" or "pg_temporary" or something different from
"pg_temp", that's fine, but I really think the files ought to clearly
label themselves as temporary. "pid" is not a clear label. With a
name like that, people might even think they are lock files.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-14 20:17:36 | Re: Removal of temp tables |
Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2001-06-14 20:03:53 | Update on Access 97 and = NULL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-14 20:17:36 | Re: Removal of temp tables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-14 19:46:41 | Re: Removal of temp tables |