From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Date: | 2008-04-14 19:47:43 |
Message-ID: | 21526.1208202463@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We should probably try to limit the focus of fests to consider only
>> actual patches, with design discussions handled "live" during normal
>> development, the way they've always been in the past.
> We have discouraged design discussions during feature freeze and beta ---
> do we want to change that?
No, changing that wasn't what I meant to suggest. My point here is that
we'd dropped a number of big mushy discussions into the queue with the
idea that they'd be re-opened during commit fest, but new discussion
did not happen to any useful extent. Conclusion: don't bother putting
anything less concrete than a patch on the fest queue.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-14 19:49:58 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 19:44:42 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |